1 edition of Review of methods of identification of high caries risk group and individuals. found in the catalog.
Review of methods of identification of high caries risk group and individuals.
|Series||FDI technical report -- no. 31|
|Contributions||International Dental Federation.|
|LC Classifications||RK331 .R48 1988|
|The Physical Object|
|Pagination||Leaves 177-189. --|
|Number of Pages||189|
The evidence on the validity for existing systems for CRA is limited. It is unknown if the identification of high‐risk individuals can lead to more effective long‐term patient management that prevents caries initiation and arrests or reverses the progression of lesions. the most relevant papers. We have also used the cariology book “Dental caries – the disease and its clinical management” (Ole Fejerskov and Edwina Kidd). Other books we have studied are “Caries risk ‐ a practical guide for assessment and control” (Bo Krasse), “On caries risk.
Risk Assessment: Identification of factors predictive of risk Project staff developed a comprehensive list of all factors thought to contribute to caries risk based on: (1) existing CRA tools, (2) factors evaluated within the published studies, and (3) individual panelist recommendations (expert opinion). A total of 57 CRA factors were identified. After an extensive review of literature on caries risk indicators, Zero, Fontana, and Lennon concluded that no single indicator or combination of risk indicators could consistently be a good predictor of caries risk status when applied across different populations and age groups. In general, however, the best indicator of future caries risk is the past caries experience, although this may not.
Three major competencies were identified: Risk Assessment– competent at identifying and estimating the probability for a patient of developing new caries lesions or progression of existing lesions during a specified period of time; Diagnosis– competent through collecting, analysing and integrating data on signs and symptoms of dental caries. Assessing caries risk is an essential element in the planning of preventive and therapeutic strategies. Different caries risk assessment (CRA) models have been proposed for the identification of individuals running a risk of future caries. This systematic review was designed to evaluate whether standardized caries risk assessment (CRA) models are able to evaluate the risk according to the.
Jack and the bean-stalk
New inquiries into the laws which are observed in the distribution of vegetable forms
Winter Wonderland, Christmas
Revenue Act of 1940
Report to the National Conference of the Romanian Communist Party, December 14, 1987 ; Speech at the end of the proceedings of the national conference, December 16, 1987
Lambeth and the Vatican or Anecdotes of the Church of Rome, of the Reformed Churches and of Sects and Sectaries
The Man Who Knew Infinity
Experimental and applied linguistics in Canada =
Hitler & Japan: the hollow alliance.
Review of methods of identification of high caries risk groups and individuals. Fédération Dentaire Internationale Technical Report No. [No authors listed] The search for methods of predicting dental caries activity began during the last century. Hunter P, Review of methods of identification of high caries risk groups and individuals.
International dental journal Traneus S. Caries risk assessment: methods available to clinician for caries detection. Fig. 1 presents a flow diagram of the literature identification and reasons for exclusion.
43% of the full-text publications were excluded due to “Other research question/main topic”. Of these, many focused on correlations between caries related factors and the development of caries.
In many studies of multifactorial risk assessment methods, such as the Cariogram, no data was available to Cited by: The aim of this article is to highlight the main goals and to describe the clinical impact of the procedures used for the identification of high-caries-risk subjects.
Since high numbers of S. mutans are associated with high caries risk, bacterial sampling can be useful for the identification of such individuals.
A method has been developed by which even large. The University of North Carolina Caries Risk Assessment study: further developments in caries risk prediction.
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol ; Dye BA, Tan S, Smith V, Lewis BG, Barker LK, Thornton-Evans G, et al. Trends in oral health status: United States, and Vital Health Stat 1.
Introduction. A group of phenotypically similar but genetically different streptococcal species (Coykendall, ), known as mutans streptococci, are considered the main aetiological agents for dental caries in humans (Hamada and Slade,Loesche, ).It is thought possible to recognize caries-susceptible individuals from the correlation between the numbers of mutans streptococci and.
recognises that the preventive strategies outlined here for high caries risk children need to be underpinned by a regular, background, systematic dental service for all children, regardless of caries risk.
For the purposes of this guideline, the term “high caries risk” refers to children who are at risk of. Caries risk assessment allows for the estimation of the probability of caries incidence, i.e., number of new cavities or incipient lesions in a certain time period, as well as the probability of the changes in the size or activity of caries lesions.
9 An accurate caries risk assessment can identify patients at high caries risk for preventive. mutans (as predictors of caries-risk) was carried out. The author supposes that levels of oral bacteria are not a promising marker of possible caries risk in individuals, but that they are an optimal marker for prediction in groups such as high-caries-risk groups of individuals.
According to [64, 65] the participation of S. sanguinis, S. oralis, S. Risk-based prevention has been advocated by researchers to the profession (25–31), but there is no generally accepted practice standard to identify individuals at high risk for root caries.
If these high-risk individuals could be identified prior to experiencing the disease, or prior to experiencing advanced disease, they could be targeted.
Objectives: To evaluate the accuracy of different methods used to identify individuals with increased risk of developing coronal dental caries. Data: Studies on following methods were included. Abstract – Objective: The aim of this prospective study was to determine whether a child population with low overall caries frequency benefits when prevention is targeted to high‐risk s: Data from clinical examinations and salivary tests were used to assess caries risk in 12‐year‐olds (n=).Children who were regarded as being at high risk of developing caries were.
Cariogram was recently used in several studies performed in different individuals of various communities.2, 6, 17, 18 Caries-risk assessment of communities allows high-caries-risk groups and treatment needs to be determined, so preventive applications can be carried out. There is insufficient data about caries-risk assessments in Turkish.
Different caries risk assessment (CRA) models have been proposed for the identification of individuals running a risk of future caries. This systematic review was designed to evaluate whether. Compared to group 1, caries risk reduction in group 2 was 28% (95% CI: to ) and 31% in group 3 (95% CI: to ).
early identification of individuals with a high caries. A recent systematic review concluded that the evidence supporting the predictive ability of existing caries risk assessment (CRA) systems is limited and that whether identification of high-risk patients improves clinical outcomes is unknown.
4 Of the few prospective studies to asses CRA-based caries prediction in adults, in one study of There are a series of identification techniques available, they may be considered to fall into three distinct classifications: (1) identification conducted solely by the risk analyst, (2) identification by the analyst interviewing a member of the project team, and (3) the analyst leading a working group.
About Cookies. Notice: Please be advised that we experienced an unexpected issue that occurred on Saturday and Sunday January 20th and 21st that caused the site to be down for an extended period of time and affected the ability of users to access content on Wiley Online issue has now been fully resolved.
We apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused and are working. efficacious individual-based preventive measures to diminish their risk This method operates to decrease the risk of a small number of highly vulnerable individuals to include them into the majority of the population with no or few caries,30 In order to use a high risk approach, one.
This study suggests that root caries is more likely to be detected in individuals with poor plaque control, a high DMFT score, coronal caries, a high number of exposed root surfaces and xerostomia.
These risk indictors should be examined in a prospective cohort study to confirm their association with the development of new root caries.Being able to identify the areas and processes in your workplace that are a source of hazard is called a Risk Assessment.
As soon as the cause of hazard is identified, the degree of risk associated with it is then analyzed in order for employers to determine appropriate methods of control or prevention.Based on the hypothesis that biological and social risks accumulate during life, it is important to identify possible dental caries risk indicators from the life course of early childhood and assess their association with caries polarization in adolescence.
A cross-sectional design was applied to the study, and a multistage cluster sampling method used to draw a representative sample of